Thursday, May 12, 2005

nipples

Why is it OK for male nipples to be displayed wherever their owners please, but a crime to show female nipples in public? Um, don't they kind of look, identical, without the context of the surrounding bodies?

Imagine a shirt that covered everything BUT the nipples (meaning, the parts that are anatomically different between the genders). That'd be a sight.

(BTW, this nipple discussion was prompted by this article in the Chicago Tribune).

3 comments:

BeckyBumbleFuck said...

Nice one! Nudity's always f*ckin funny for some reason. Or maybe it's just me and they shouldn't have let me pass on to grade 6.
*wink*

sojourning crow said...

b/c people in the U.S. are too immature to be able to stand the pressence of nudity in publi c. Be caus ethis country was founded and still rules by the Puritans!~! Because parents cannot explain to their children (except if they are members of a religion that allows optional nudity) that nudity is pefectly natural not perverse. Because people of this country are repressed about their sexuality and think that so many things related to nudity and sex are a big deal, but have not stopped to realize that if they too responsibility for themselves it wouldn't be....
ok, rant complete. BTW it's illegal for females in NY, as long as that are not making money from it.

Kat E said...

well said, soujourning crow. It *was* a rather rhetorical post...